Recently there have been ads on TV and web discussion concerning the privatization of the Provincial Government’s IT services.
The claim mainly rests on who the service provider is responsible to. A government employee is responsible to the Government, which is responsible to the people. A corporate employee is responsible to the company, which is responsible to the owner(s)/shareholders.
http://www.ifyoulovesaskatchewan.ca/privatization_threats/technology.html
The argument is: If a company’s bottom line is threatened, it will choose the least damaging option, which may put the people of the province at risk.
I’m not going to argue about whether this is right or wrong, either logically or in reality. What I want to argue is, in an environment where you have people with the I.S.P. designation, it is a moot point. From this page, there are two key points about the I.S.P. to understand:
- Standards of Ethics and Practice – Holding an I.S.P. designation means that your IT staff members have agreed to be bound by the CIPS Code of Ethics. Their intentions can be trusted. I.S.P. holders only undertake work that they are qualified to do. This reduces your organization’s management risk. You can trust an I.S.P. holder.
- Public confidence – Organizations can have peace of mind knowing that their clients and customers can rely on I.S.P. holders to abide by the highest standards of ethics and professional conduct. CIPS has a review process to investigate complaints regarding I.S.P. holders or CIPS members who may have violated the CIPS Code of Ethics.
Hire people with the I.S.P. designation, and you can be confident they will do the right thing.